Solutions
Explore how to grow

Your site doesn't always need more visits. Often it needs less friction.
That's the point that moves the most money and the one most companies overlook. They invest in paid media, SEO, social or demand-generation campaigns, but they keep pushing traffic toward a site that isn't ready to sell. The result is predictable: more sessions, the same problem, low conversion.
If you're looking into how to increase web conversions, there's an uncomfortable truth worth accepting early: the problem is rarely in a single piece. It's usually not “the button,” “the design” or “the form.” It's normally a combination of weak signals that, together, stall the decision to buy or get in touch.
The good news is that this can be fixed. And when it's fixed properly, the impact shows without having to double your acquisition spend.
Increasing conversion doesn't mean pressuring the user more. It means making the decision you want them to make easier, clearer and more trustworthy.
In eCommerce, that can translate into more completed purchases, more recovered carts and a better average order value. In services companies, it usually looks like more forms submitted, more meetings booked and better leads. In both cases, the logic is the same: reduce uncertainty and increase intent.
That's why serious conversion work blends strategy, UX, design, copy, speed, analytics and continuous testing. When a company looks at only one of those layers, it improves little. When it aligns them, the site starts to perform as a commercial asset, not just a storefront.
Before changing banners, colours or headlines, you have to understand where people drop off. Many redesign decisions fail for that reason. They're carried out on internal opinions rather than evidence.
If a landing page gets traffic but doesn't convert, the causes can be very different. Sometimes the value proposition is weak. Other times the problem is on mobile, in the speed, in the form structure or in the offer not being clear enough to justify the action.
It also happens that the user is genuinely interested, but the page gives them no reasons to trust. They don't find case studies, reviews, guarantees, timelines, estimated prices or signals of credibility. So they put it off. And what gets put off usually doesn't come back.
That's why any serious strategy starts with data: heatmaps, recordings, scroll, event analytics, funnels and traffic sources. Not to look at pretty dashboards, but to spot specific friction points.
Most websites lose conversions above the fold. Not because they look bad, but because they don't make it clear what they sell, for whom and why to choose them.
That first block has to answer quickly. If a visitor lands and has to interpret too much, you're already too late. Clarity converts better than visual sophistication.
A good main message isn't built around “looking premium.” It's built so the user understands the commercial benefit. Less ornament, more precision. What you solve, how much faster, how much simpler, how much more profitable.
And there's a key detail: not every audience responds the same way. A sales manager wants to see impact on sales. A marketing lead wants to see channel performance. An eCommerce owner wants to see less leakage and more revenue from the same traffic. If you speak to everyone at once, you dilute your impact.
A site can be visually attractive and convert poorly. This happens more often than it seems.
Conversion depends on navigation being intuitive, the visual hierarchy helping people decide and each screen having a clear objective. If the page is full of stimuli, blocks competing with each other and calls to action without context, the user doesn't move forward. They get distracted or worn out.
On mobile the problem is amplified. Today a significant share of traffic comes from phones, but many companies still evaluate the site from desktop. That's where real opportunities slip away: poorly placed buttons, endless text, awkward forms, slow load times and sections that demand too much effort.
Improving UX isn't “beautifying.” It's removing obstacles. Sometimes that means simplifying a menu. Other times, reducing fields, organizing content, improving contrast, changing sequences or making the next step more visible.
There are sites that explain their offer well but still convert poorly. In many of those cases, what's missing is trust.
People don't buy just because they understood. They buy when they also feel enough confidence to move forward. That confidence is built with concrete elements: real testimonials, verified reviews, client logos, case studies with results, guarantees, clear policies, visible payment methods, accessible support and visual consistency.
In services, showing experience and social proof changes performance directly. In eCommerce, trust affects the entire journey, from the product page to the checkout.
That said, these signals have to be used with judgment. Filling a page with badges or grandiose phrases doesn't replace a solid proposition. Trust isn't decorated. It's demonstrated.
Friction appears when the user wants to move forward and the site asks for too much.
It could be a long form for a simple enquiry. It could be a checkout with unnecessary steps. It could be a landing page that forces people to look for critical information on another page. Or a contact button that opens late, gets lost or doesn't create continuity.
Every micro-obstacle lowers intent. And although individually they may seem minor, when they pile up they cause conversion to drop sharply.
A good practice is to review the entire journey as if you were the customer. What doubts come up? What information is missing? What part demands unnecessary effort? Which step seems risky or confusing? That's usually where the changes with the highest return are.
It's not always best to reduce everything to the minimum. Sometimes a higher-quality lead needs more context or a better pre-qualification. It depends on the business, the ticket size and the commercial cost of handling poorly qualified contacts. Optimizing conversion isn't just about increasing volume. It's about improving overall performance.
When a site loads slowly, it converts less. That's not an opinion. It's real behaviour.
Slowness affects the first impression, interrupts navigation and worsens the mobile experience. It also tends to increase bounce and lower interaction depth. If the site lags, the user assumes friction even before reading.
Here's a common mistake: thinking speed is just a technical issue. It isn't. It has a direct commercial impact.
Heavy images, unnecessary scripts, poorly managed plugins, excessive animations and unoptimized development end up costing sales. The same goes for implementation errors that break forms, duplicate events or prevent accurate measurement. If you can't trust your data, you can't optimize with precision either.
Most companies have opinions about why their site converts poorly. Few validate them.
That's where real CRO comes in: forming hypotheses, prioritizing changes and measuring impact. It's not about changing for the sake of changing. It's about learning what moves the needle in your business.
Sometimes a change in the main message improves more than a full redesign. Other times, the leap is in the checkout, in the product pages or in a specific landing that receives high paid traffic. The point is that not every page deserves the same level of attention at the same time.
It's best to start where there's the most volume or the most economic impact. The pages with the most traffic, the highest intent or the most leakage usually offer the quickest opportunities.
That's why, instead of rebuilding the entire site, many companies achieve better results with a continuous improvement approach. Same traffic. Better results.
If you need to prioritize, start with four layers: message, trust, friction and speed. That's where the most conversions are gained in the least time.
Check whether the value proposition is understood in seconds, whether there's enough social proof, whether the journey has unnecessary steps and whether the technical performance keeps up. Then move on to finer optimizations: visual hierarchy, CTAs, content structure, landing page segmentation or personalization by traffic source.
If your business already invests in campaigns, this review becomes urgent. Every paid click that lands on a poorly optimized site raises CAC and weakens the channel's overall return.
That's where a specialized approach makes a difference. At Bigbuda, for example, the focus isn't just on building sites, but on turning them into sales assets with analytics, UX, CRO and continuous improvement based on real data.
The useful question isn't whether your site “looks good.” The question is whether it's selling at the level it could. And if the answer is no, you probably don't need to wait for more traffic to grow. You need a site that stops losing opportunities you're already paying for.
Related article: Optimize websites in Chile and improve your conversions.
With CRO: clarity in the proposition, social proof, speed, effective CTAs and continuous data-based optimization.
Not always: it's often better to first convert your current traffic more effectively before investing in more visits.
With heatmaps, funnels and A/B tests that show where and why users drop off.